|
Anna
May 15, 2007 13:08:23 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 15, 2007 13:08:23 GMT -5
Harry is totally gonna die. He's gotten so ... whiny as time progresses. Tempter tantrums, table for one.
I think Rowling is gonna pull a fast one on us. I think she's killed off enough people that the only way she could top it was if she didn't kill anyone, and instead brought some back to life. I honestly believe that Dumbledore is gonna make some kind of appearance, and the title makes me think that perhaps Harry's parents will be involved in some form.
|
|
|
Anna
May 15, 2007 13:27:19 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 15, 2007 13:27:19 GMT -5
I think Harry will die, but Rowling will get a lot of complaints if she does. Too many devastated youngsters.
Dumbledore won't come back. No way, no how. I want Sirius to make an appearence. I was more upset when he died than when Dumbledore died.
|
|
|
Anna
May 15, 2007 13:46:55 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 15, 2007 13:46:55 GMT -5
That's because Sirius's death was significantly more random than Dumbledore's. In Sirius's case, the battle was already sort of winding down, then he suddenly got blasted, and there was no body there to give Harry true closure. In Dumbledore's case ... well, he was surrounded and weakened.
I just mostly want Dumbledore to make an appearance because I need some reason to get Snape back on the side of ambiguity. We were always sorta wondering whether he was evil or not, and now that's he's killed Dumbledore, he seems irredeemable.
|
|
|
Anna
May 16, 2007 4:39:44 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 16, 2007 4:39:44 GMT -5
Snape is not evil. Dumbledore would have wanted him to keep his cover in the Dark Lord's inner circle at any cost - even his own life.
|
|
|
Anna
May 16, 2007 13:29:17 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 16, 2007 13:29:17 GMT -5
IF that is true, it was a dumb and unlucky move on Snape's part. Dumb because the good guys have lost one of their most powerful allies. Unlucky because Harry was there to see everything, and now that Harry has told everyone that Snape himself offed Dumbledore, who's going to believe anything that Snape says from now on?
|
|
|
Anna
May 24, 2007 14:58:11 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 24, 2007 14:58:11 GMT -5
Actually, it's the smartest thing that he could have done in the situation. If Snape had lowered his wand and let Dumbledore live, the Order would have lost their one spy within Voldemort's inner circle. After that, who's to say that either of them would have lived. In the long run, it was a better idea - Dumbledore wouldn't have wanted Snape to be compromised. As for unlucky - yeah, it was damn unlucky.
|
|
|
Anna
May 24, 2007 17:22:55 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 24, 2007 17:22:55 GMT -5
I can't shake the feeling that perhaps Snape told Dumbledore about the Unbreakable Vow he made to help Malfoy, and Dumbledore decided to ... let Snape kill him, after he made sure that Harry knew about the horcruxes and what he could expect in his quest to destroy them?
|
|
|
Anna
May 25, 2007 3:48:37 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 25, 2007 3:48:37 GMT -5
Round of applause for Pesto! That's my reckoning too.
|
|
|
Anna
May 26, 2007 10:19:36 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 26, 2007 10:19:36 GMT -5
I feel like Nancy Drew or something.
With a penis of course.
I so wanna see that movie.
|
|
|
Anna
May 26, 2007 12:57:37 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 26, 2007 12:57:37 GMT -5
Who's in it again?
|
|
|
Anna
May 26, 2007 18:41:48 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 26, 2007 18:41:48 GMT -5
I haven't the slightest. The girl who plays Nancy Drew was in that mermaid movie, and she's the star of Unfabulous on Nickelodeon. I believe she's Julia Roberts' ....
Emma Roberts! I think that's her name. She's supposed to be Julia Roberts' niece or something.
|
|
|
Anna
May 26, 2007 21:11:11 GMT -5
Post by rubus on May 26, 2007 21:11:11 GMT -5
nice. what was it that you were talking about?
|
|
|
Anna
May 26, 2007 21:42:34 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 26, 2007 21:42:34 GMT -5
We were talking about the highly unlikely possibility that Snape is not evil.
|
|
|
Anna
May 27, 2007 6:05:13 GMT -5
Post by AshVersion2 on May 27, 2007 6:05:13 GMT -5
You mean the absolute certainty.
|
|
|
Anna
May 27, 2007 7:44:04 GMT -5
Post by Chris on May 27, 2007 7:44:04 GMT -5
Ok, sure. Cling to that.
|
|