|
Post by johnsapphire on Nov 14, 2006 20:57:49 GMT -5
Now then, I thought it would be best to create my own thread, because I'm certain that the one thing everyone wants to read is a collection of random facts about myself.
I am quadralingual, but you have to work out in what languages on your own. And it really isn't that difficult.
I am vice-KEPPELMEISTER in my school symphony orchestra. *cough*[shadow=red,left,300]clue[/shadow]*cough*
I love Verdi, as my avatar and random shoutings benefit.
Eakyra (Eaky) and I will be married by myself this saturday. Be there. And bring a wedding present.
I am a renowned rationalist atheist (like Richard Dawkins, only less biological). The earth was not created 6000 years ago (1000 years AFTER the babylonians created glue). Scientists have measured entirely independent factors in the earth (potassium, argon, etc.) and ALL results have pointed towards 4.6 BILLION years. The problem is that so many humans do not have the mental capacity to grasp the concept of a billion. Plus, an ill-informed "divine" book (written without science) is in the process of having an affect on your irritating country of America similar to that of a [insert clever allegory here].
Did you know Britain publishes 35% MORE books than all of America EVERY YEAR? We're cool like that. Except in cooking. Our food is crap. That's why I go for Italian cuisine.
TO BE CONTINUED.
|
|
|
Post by johnsapphire on Nov 16, 2006 20:45:40 GMT -5
I really shouldn't have included that poll option.
|
|
|
Post by Gil Alexander on Nov 16, 2006 20:57:44 GMT -5
Lol. This is very interesting. Continue...
|
|
Spinner
Rank 2 (STILL a Newbie)
Posts: 223
|
Post by Spinner on Nov 17, 2006 7:30:32 GMT -5
An atheist... interesting... I for one am sort of an agnostic... But if too decide between (1)St. Thomas Aquinas' proof of an intellectual god rather than an unitellectual universe unaware of its own state of eternality(is there even such a word?) and (2)a repetitive big bang... hmmmm.... I'd go for the former... but hey, that's just me...
welcome to the site where you should have welcomed me since you came first but don't mind that anyway...lol
|
|
|
Post by Denithar on Nov 17, 2006 10:38:38 GMT -5
Facinating. There are very few true agnostics left. You should add an interesting twist on the debates. Welcome to the site.
|
|
Spinner
Rank 2 (STILL a Newbie)
Posts: 223
|
Post by Spinner on Nov 17, 2006 21:21:08 GMT -5
i'll just end up randomizing everything...lol
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 20, 2006 16:05:56 GMT -5
Welcome to the site John and Hadyn. Sorry it's so belated.
|
|
|
Post by johnsapphire on Nov 20, 2006 18:52:12 GMT -5
Thou art forgiven.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 20, 2006 22:35:25 GMT -5
I almost wish I could change my vote now.
'Almost' is the operative word in that sentence, though.
|
|
|
Post by johnsapphire on Nov 22, 2006 19:50:53 GMT -5
Which option did you vote for?
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 22, 2006 20:15:00 GMT -5
I'm with the majority.
|
|
|
Post by johnsapphire on Nov 23, 2006 0:10:48 GMT -5
And you wish you had voted for...?
|
|
|
Post by Gil Alexander on Nov 23, 2006 0:34:11 GMT -5
Lol, why don't you tell us more about yourself, instead of using this thread to learn what others think of you? :-)
|
|
|
Post by Denithar on Nov 23, 2006 11:16:44 GMT -5
"A rude, pompous, excellent writer." That was my vote.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 23, 2006 15:38:15 GMT -5
If I were to change my vote, I'd change it to "Who?". if only because none of the other selections are appropriate.
EDIT: Now that I've read your play, I'd change it to "Rude, pompous, excellent writer". Now I see that even though you toot your horn too much, at least you're not the hack I was beginning to suspect you were. Excellent job. Expect a full review in future.
|
|